American Financial Services Association - FTC “Unfair or Deceptive Fees” Rulemaking
Member login
American Financial Services Association

FTC “Unfair or Deceptive Fees” Rulemaking

Blog Posts

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently released a notice of proposed rulemaking concerning “unfair or deceptive fees.” AFSA commented on the proposed rule this week, agreeing with the FTC that consumers should be protected from hidden or misleading fees and explaining that in the financial services market they already are.

With this rulemaking, the FTC is attempting to eliminate:

  1. Hidden fees by requiring all mandatory fees be added up and clearly and conspicuously disclosed as the “total price,” and;
  2. Misleading fees by requiring businesses to clearly and conspicuously disclose any amount a consumer must pay that is excluded from the “total price.”

AFSA wrote that because there are already several laws and regulations requiring clear disclosures by financial services providers, the FTC should exempt creditors from the rulemaking.

As drafted, the FTC’s proposed rule would not help consumers shopping for credit products and services, but merely add confusion. The FTC does not provide any guidance as to what fees are a part of the “total price,” or how the “total price” should be disclosed in conjunction with other required disclosures. This will lead to confusion for consumers. Such fees as late fees are mandatory but not necessarily imposed. If one creditor decides to include late fees and another does not, consumers could not use the “total price” to comparison shop.

Even if both creditors decide to include late fees, they may decide to include them in different ways. One creditor might include a single late fee and the other might include twelve. This lack of consistency makes the “total price” meaningless. AFSA included several other examples in the comments to the FTC where uncertainty about the calculation of fees in the total price would lead to uncertainty and unintended consequences.

The FTC proposed rule is part of a broader push from the administration against “junk fees.” No one, including AFSA members, condone true “junk fees.” However, using “junk fee” rhetoric and attempting to proscribe fees that are legitimate and authorized by state law, even if they are disliked by regulators, is not appropriate.

AFSA has voiced concerns against this rhetoric manytimes in the past few years, and will continue to do so. We have made it clear that when states and federal legislative bodies have authorized these fees and made clear the disclosure requirements, regulatory agencies do not have authority to outlaw them. Therefore, to the extent the proposed rule conflicts with applicable law allowing, the rule must be changed.

FTC “Unfair or Deceptive Fees” Rulemaking
Feb 15, 2024

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently released a notice of proposed rulemaking concerning “unfair or deceptive fees.” AFSA commented on the proposed rule this week, agreeing with the FTC that consumers should be protected from … Read the rest

2024 Independents Conference Keynote Confirmed!
Feb 08, 2024

Strengthen every relationship you build. Gain more impact and influence in your life and your business at AFSA’s 2024 Independents Conference & Expo.

AFSA is pleased to announce that Lt. Col. (ret.) Scott Mann will keynote the 2024 Independents… Read the rest

Post-’24 Committee Leadership Will Change
Feb 01, 2024

As Congressional members continue to announce retirements and election match-ups become more clear, much speculation has been put into how committee leadership will change following the 2024 elections. The process to determine chairs… Read the rest

AFSA Supports Competition and Access to Credit
Jan 24, 2024

AFSA joined with the National Association of Industrial Bankers, the Utah Bankers Association, and the Nevada Bankers Association in a letter to all Senators in opposition to S. 3538, the misnamed “Close the Shadow Banking Loophole Act,”… Read the rest

Congress Has Questions About “Risky Business”
Jan 23, 2024

Yesterday, a bipartisan group of Members of Congress sent a letter to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to express their concerns about a CFPB nonbank procedural rule. These eight members, many of whom serve on the House Financial… Read the rest

Alfa Announces Originations for US Auto Finance
Jan 22, 2024

The second of six releases that make up Alfa Systems 6, a breakthrough iteration of the Alfa Systems software platform, sets a new standard for excellence in US auto finance originations.

Alfa, a pioneer in technology for automotive finance,… Read the rest

New Jersey’s Data Disclosure Bills
Jan 11, 2024

AFSA’s State Government Affairs team recently sent a comment letter to the New Jersey General Assembly regarding NJ A1971 and S332 on collection and disclosure of personal data by certain entities. In the letter AFSA raises concerns … Read the rest

Massachusetts Proposed Junk Fee Regulations
Jan 11, 2024

AFSA’s State Government Affairs team sent a comment letter to the Massachusetts Office of Attorney General (OAG) on the proposed regulations related to Unfair and Deceptive Fees. In the letter, AFSA highlights concerns with the proposed… Read the rest

The Economic Outlook for 2024: Recession? Probably Not. Vibecession? Definitely.
Jan 11, 2024

AFSA Chief Economist Tim Gill has joined the prestigious The Wall Street Journal’s longstanding Economic Forecasting Survey panel. The panel consists of approximately 75 economists from academia, financial institutions, consulting… Read the rest

Small Business Review Panel Issues Report On FCRA Rulemaking
Jan 11, 2024

This week the Small Business Review Panel issued its “Final Report” on the CFPB’s Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) proposals. This is part of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s rulemaking process. The Small Business Regulatory … Read the rest

1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 140