No to Unlocked Handsets
This week, AFSA wrote to the FCC on a proposed rule that would require handsets to be unlocked even if the installment contract has not been paid off. There are three major concerns with the proposal:
- There are substantial questions as to whether the FCC has the authority or the jurisdiction to mandate the unlocking of handsets. Several courts have held that the FCC cannot interfere or affect contracts between wireless providers and third parties, including their customers, and cannot nullify state-law remedies.
- Mandating device unlocking not only increases wireless providers’ financial risks relative to the customer, it reduces the options to offset risk through securitization arrangements.
- The FCC acknowledged in 2019 that mandating handset unlocking too soon increases the potential for fraud, as bad actors can make purchases under false names and resell the unlocked handsets.
While AFSA wants to work with the FCC to improve consumer choice and flexibility, the increased risk of this new rule only increases the price the consumer has to pay and the risk that businesses have to carry.
September 26th, 2024
Get The News You Need
Sign up for our daily newsletter to receive all the most important industry news and updates every weekday morning.
Recent Posts
- FDIC Says Yes to Stellantis
- New Voice for Consumer Finance
- Industry Expertise | What Lenders Don’t See in the Dealership Payoff Process
- Industry Expertise | Seeing the Full Picture in Auto Finance
- Q1 C3 Index Released